The truth is that the majority of those on Twitter who are advocating for non-abusive and non-aggressive behavior on a show that is totally founded on these ideas are acting. Faceless creatures on Twitter who give celebrities tips on how to act on national television are also not saints.

For a show like "Bigg Boss," the concept of a "neutral audience" is a fallacy, and what transpires on social media as a result is a tug of war between the show's celebrity audiences. Something that happens on the broadcast or on social media has no legal or ethical justification.

As host Salman Khan has stated multiple times, it is a show where an individual must represent themselves with a specific meaning. It might be a Shehnaaz, with her sincerity and ability to entertain, or a Sidharth, with his reasonable mind and violence. It may be someone like Gauahar, with her fiery attitude, or someone like Vikas Gupta, with his financial savvy. These traits come at the cost of hiding the best sides of one's nature; in their respective seasons, Sidharth suppressed his lighthearted and sentimental side, while Gauahar suppressed her humanitarian side.

The public's view of their flaws becomes the talk of the town, sparking a slapstick social media PR war. Many people who know, say, person A personally or have previously known him, back him up and criticize his opponents. Person B is in a similar situation. Battle lines are drawn in plain sight via posts and videos on Twitter and Instagram. Despite the fact that the entire exhibition screams rivalry for all participants, not just two races, more significant issues like as female equality, feminism, and chauvinism are addressed.

Journalists become complicit in the distrust because of their allegiances and contacts. Fans, mostly between the ages of 15 and 40, are affected, and the conversation surrounding a minor conflict escalates to abysmal heights of slut-shaming and, at times, body shaming as a result. When Sidharth Shukla was frequently told on the show and on social media that he was 39 in the thirteenth season, age shaming became a tactic.

The listener gets tricked, which is ironic. Do you have any other explanations for the recurring patterns carried out in these contestants' names? The battles of their idols become their own, and tight patterns emerge at all hours of the day and night. In many ways, these are bots aiming to increase the social media presence of an unknown person. More than half of the crowd, however, is made up of genuine people who squander their time following patterns.

There's also a subset of social media influencers who use video ratings to "influence" the opinions of a larger audience. Several of them were former season contestants, and it goes without saying that they are to blame for more than half of the vices they claim to be highlighting in their ratings.

The live feed from the house was available to viewers of the most recent season of 'Bigg Boss.' This proved what had already been stated about the show: it is not scripted, but it is severely edited. Season 14's live stream contained so many moments that needed to be telecast in the main event, such as Sidharth joking about. Nobody, on the other hand, had to be having a good time. Drama sells, and 'Bigg Boss' is all about drama.

There's no need to assess a celebrity or participant merely on the basis of 24-hour clips condensed into a one-hour show. If they are to be judged at all, the key challenge is to judge them based on how real they are. Toxic positivity is condemning, shading, or berating someone for a reason (read: shading and shaming – of any kind — are just as harmful, if not worse, than abuse). Check more info about Bigg Boss 15.

'Bigg Boss' is a ridiculous combination of public relations tactics, fan feuds, and human behavior in quarantine (read: sans cell phones) that exists simply to entertain the viewer. It's past time we stopped taking it so seriously.

Hide Comments | Add Comment